Jason ye
11/11/2013
GVPT200
The financial crisis of 2008, which is
also known as the Global Financial Crisis is considered by many people the
worst financial crisis since the 1930s Great Depression. It resulted in
bankruptcy of financial institutions, high rate of unemployment, collapse of
the stock market and bailed out from the U.S government to some of the biggest
financial institutions in the U.S. So why did the U.S government bailed out
American International Group, Bear Stearns and nationalized Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac but did not help out
Lehman Brothers and let it fail.
Frist
reason, in my opinion, the U.S government bailed out American International
Group instead of Lehman Brother is all about the impact on financial markets.
American International Group is the largest insurance company in the world, it insures
not just millions of people but also corporations around the world as well. It
also insures millions of dollars issued by the financial institutions’ lenders
and borrowers. If American International Group collapse, it will have a
tremendous effect on those financial institutions that are insured by the
American International Group, which may result in collapse of those financial
institutions too. The American International Group is like an ignorant kid playing with matches, he could harm not only
himself, he could have burn down the entire block, the Fed stepped in not just
to save him but also save the entire block, on the other hand, Lehman Brother is
more like a kid who pulls the tail of a dog and got attacked by the dog,
himself is harmed by the dog but nobody is harmed because of that, so nobody
really care about it that much.
Second reason I think why Lehman Brothers did
not get bailed out by the U.S government is because its lacked collateral for a
loan. During the 2008 financial crisis, before the Troubled Asset Relief
Program (TARP) was established, it was illegal for the government to inject
capital into Lehman Brothers. Unlike the American International Group, which
had insurance addendum that can be evaluative, the Lehman Brothers lacks of ancillary
resulted in the Federal Reserve deiced not to bail out Lehman Brothers. Lacked
collateral is also a reason why the two potential buyers – Bank of America and
Barclays decided to back out at the last moment. Also, there were concerns of
“lending into a run”, some top government officers feared giving Lehman
Brothers loan can cause its customers to flee away which will ensuring its
bankruptcy.
The last reason why the U.S government did
not bail out Lehman Brothers is that the risk to taxpayers is high, like Bernanke said, “Lehman's status as a going concern was
"melting away" as trading partners pulled back from the firm amid
questions about its capital position and access to cash. The Fed couldn't have
lent to Lehman without risking a large loss.”
Overall, the reasons why the
U.S government didn’t bail out Lehman Brother are reasonable, but it might be
better for the economic if the U.S government had bailed out Lehman Brother.
I really like your analogy about why the US government bailed out American International group instead of Lehman Brothers and I completely agree. American International did have the ability to compensate for its bailout because like you said they are the largest insurance company in the world. I also believe however, that there was some personal interest and stake involved when it came to choosing to bail out AIG because they insure congress' pension plans as well as other pensions for state and government employees.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the U.S government bailed out the American International Group instead of the Lehman Brothers because they knew that if they let the AIG collapse it would turn into a domino effect and many other organizations that depending on it would fall too.
ReplyDelete